Responding to the controversy surrounding Coquille’s proposed casino project in Medford, Oregon, Brenda Meade, the chair of the Coquille Indian Tribe, has spoken out against the criticism and misinformation spread by opposing tribes. The project has faced significant backlash from several tribes in California and Oregon, who claim that the Coquille was “reservation shopping” and attempting to add land unjustifiably.

The Casino Project Should Bolster Local Communities

Speaking for OregonLive, Meade described how the casino project came into existence. In 2012, the Coquille Tribe applied to take land into trust in Medford, part of their designated service area, for a new on-reservation casino. She noted that the proposed casino, though small, would enable the tribe to expand services and address the needs of their citizens, families, and the broader community.

According to Meade, Medford had the second-highest concentration of Coquille citizens at the time of the tribe’s restoration, justifying the casino project. She emphasized that the Coquille Tribe’s struggle for recognition and rights has been fraught with challenges stemming from historical injustices, including termination and dispossession, expressing dismay that ignorance and misinformation continued to undermine their rights and sovereignty.

Although some things have improved for us, ignorance still leads to ongoing attacks on our rights and sovereignty.

Brenda Meade, Coquille Indian Tribe chair

Meade criticized the opposing tribes’ claims of “off-reservation” gaming and “reservation shopping,” describing these accusations as baseless and rooted in a misunderstanding of tribal land rights. She drew attention to the Coquille Restoration Act, which established a five-county service area for reservation building, influenced by federal policies that dispersed the tribe across the landscape.

Ongoing Lobbying Could Damage Tribal Sovereignty

According to Meade, misleading claims by other tribes had gained traction due to their excessive lobbying as they were afraid of losing their undisputed gaming monopoly along Oregon’s I-5 corridor. She referred to these accusations as baseless, referring to the Coquille Restoration Act as definitive proof that the tribe was within its rights to proceed with the casino project.

Meade appealed to fellow tribal leaders and supporters of tribal rights, urging them to prioritize tribal sovereignty over competitive interests. She recounted how the Coquille Tribe had once faced competition concerns from a neighboring tribe but chose to support tribal rights over maintaining exclusivity. The resulting agreement benefited both parties, highlighting how cooperation could build lasting prosperity.

I would be happy to speak with any tribal leader on how to balance concerns about competition in a way that lifts us all while protecting Oregon’s economy and environment.

Brenda Meade, Coquille Indian Tribe chair

Meade argued that the current backlash could set an unfortunate precedent, subjecting any tribal restoration to years of legal action as millions get wasted on lobbying. Her call for unity and respect for sovereignty was a poignant reminder of the importance of supporting tribal communities in their ongoing fight for recognition and self-determination.

The post Coquille Tribe Responds to Backlash against Oregon Casino Project appeared first on Keno Wizard.

Sweden’s gambling regulator, the Spelinspektionen, has responded positively to recently proposed changes to the Money Laundering Act that would adjust penalty fees for AML violations. However, the authority proposed a different approach for fines that are less serious and unsystematic.

Under the proposed adjustments, the Spelinspektionen must adjust penalty fines for operators that violate the country’s anti-money laundering rules. Starting April 1, 2024, the Spelinspektionen must specify a maximum fine size for violations of the AML laws, in line with the rules outlined in the Gambling Act.

Under these rules, the Spelinspektionen can revoke the license of a regulator that has committed serious, repeated or systematic violations. In the meantime, the Spelinspektionen is limited to issuing a correction order for violations that are not serious, repeated or systematic.

The Spelinspektionen is fairly positive about the changes but noted that the issuing of a correction order might not be an appropriate intervention for certain offenses. As a result, the authority may lack the relevant opportunity to intervene in certain cases.

The Spelinspektionen also noted that since violations of the Money Laundering Act have several alternative ways to calculate the maximum possible penalty, they should be regulated in a separate provision.

In the meantime, the Spelinspektionen welcomed the introduction of a written requirement for telephone sales of gaming services as this would help to protect consumers from harm.

In other news, the Swedish government recently proposed the allocation of more money to the Spelinspektionen and Finansinspektionen. Seeking to encourage a collaborative effort between the two regulators in the war on unlicensed gambling, the government allocated more budget to both entities.

Under the proposal, the Spelinspektionen would receive SEK 10.8 million (around $970,000) in 2024, SEK 15.6 million ($1.4 million) in 2025 and SEK 18.5 million ($1.66 million) in 2026. The Finansinspektionen, on the other hand, would receive SEK 4.5 million ($400,000) in 2024.

Earlier this month, the regulator also published information about the Swedish gambling market’s performance in the second quarter of the year, reporting that the authority’s licensees collectively recorded a turnover of SEK 6.7 billion (around $602,000) during the period.

Last month, the Swedish National Audit Office decided to probe into the Spelinspektionen’s work, evaluating the regulator’s actions, strategies, and overall effectiveness.

The post Spelinspektionen Responds Positively to Proposed Money Laundering Act Changes   appeared first on Keno Wizard.