In a stunning occurrence at the Kangwon Land Casino in Gangwon Province, South Korea, a Chinese national in his 50s was arrested for arson after reportedly setting fire to his hotel room following substantial gambling losses. The event took place early on the morning of July 4 when, as authorities suspect, the man lit the fire out of rage.

Arsonist’s Blaze Engulfs Gangwon Land Hotel Room

The fire started around 2:30 am on the 14th floor of Gangwon Land Hotel, reported The Korea Herald. Law enforcement officials from Jeongseon Police Station have said that the man admitted during questioning he bought gasoline from a nearby gas station and then used it and a lighter together to burn down his room after losing what the police described as an enormous sum at the casino. 

Surveillance footage from security cameras installed throughout the hotel helped identify the suspect who had been hiding in a guest house near the gambling facility for several hours following his alleged act.

Emergency responders arrived quickly enough so that within ten minutes sprinklers inside each affected area extinguished all flames completely. However, six guests staying one floor above suffered smoke inhalation and were treated with oxygen but did not require hospitalization.

There was significant damage done by this destructive event estimated at about KRW3 million ($2,173) because most of the interior of the room was burnt black due to the intense heat generated by such a large-scale fire. The incident also led to a sleepless night for many hotel guests, who were evacuated during the emergency response.

Arson at Kangwon Land Spurs Debate on Casino Safety and Regulation

Kangwon Land is notable for being South Korea’s only casino where locals are allowed to gamble alongside foreigners. Only a few establishments authorized by the government can engage in gambling because of strict regulations in the country. 

Authorities are still looking into the matter as more information is being gathered about the suspect’s actions leading up to and during the fire. The man continues to be held in custody on charges related to South Korea’s rigid fire prevention statutes.

This incident has sparked conversations regarding safety precautions taken at gambling establishments and mental health effects caused by financial failures resulting from bets made at such facilities.

The police often find themselves dealing with crimes like these because people who commit them typically have big debts that they need to repay. The South Korean authorities are likely to review current protocols to prevent similar occurrences in the future. As the investigation unfolds, further details are expected to shed light on the motivations and circumstances that led to this destructive act.

The post Gambler’s Fury Sparks Chaos at South Korea’s Kangwon Land Casino Hotel appeared first on Keno Wizard.

In the 1950s, a federal excise tax on sports wagers was implemented as a method to fight against illegal gambling. The tax, which is 0.0025% of every sports wager has remained in place since, despite efforts of lawmakers against it. While at the time, only Nevada was affected by the tax, this is not the case at present.

Now, a newly introduced legislation, supported by Sen. Richard Blumenthal and Rep. Andrea Salinas, proposes to use the money raised from the federal excise tax on sports betting to develop a new fund that will help with research, treatment and prevention of gambling addiction.

Per the new proposal, labeled as the “Gambling Addiction, Recovery, Investment, and Treatment Act,” some 50% of the tax, which is often referred to as the handle tax, would be used for funding the initiative.

As announced by the Nevada Independent, Salinas and Blumenthal released a joint statement, highlighting the importance of dedicating more funds toward research, treatment and prevention of gambling harm across the country. “The growing legalization of sports and online betting, paired with the ability to place bets from your phone whenever you want have created a perfect storm for gambling addiction,” explained Blumenthal. Additionally, he said: “Dedicated federal resources to tackle problem gambling head-on will provide much-needed support, resources and treatment for those suffering from gambling addiction.”

According to Salinas and Blumenthal, the new proposal is supported by the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG). The duo confirmed that the proposed bill also enjoys approval from problem gambling councils in Connecticut and Oregon.

Not Everyone Agrees with the Proposed Handle Tax Bill

The proposed legislation about the handle tax surely surprised Rep. Dina Titus, one of the long-term opponents of the tax. For 10 years, she has been trying to repeal the federal excise tax on sports betting, deeming it “redundant.” On Friday, Titus supported her position that the federal excise tax isn’t needed considering that states that have legalized sports betting already dedicate resources toward fighting problem gambling.

“Nearly every tax dollar earmarked for problem gambling services comes from casino gaming taxes, including new legal sports betting and iGaming markets.“

Chris Cylke, SVP of the American Gaming Association

Chris Cylke, the American Gaming Association’s senior vice president, shared Rep. Titus’ position. He explained that both legal online gambling and sports betting activities across the country raise money for problem gambling. Additionally, Cylke warned that amid the expansion of legal gambling across the country, the “antiquated” federal excise tax represents a disadvantage for licensed operators and favors the illegal gambling sector, where no license fees or taxes are paid any way.

The post Federal Handle Tax Bill Sparks Industry Controversy appeared first on Keno Wizard.

The Adams administration unveiled a comprehensive zoning proposal that could pave the way for casino developments across broad sections of New York City. 

Proposed Zoning Overhaul Opens Doors for Casinos Across New York City

Unlike the city’s current zoning regulations, the proposed changes would permit the establishment of casinos in any manufacturing district and nearly all commercial areas, with minimal restrictions on their size. The scope of the proposal extends beyond just gambling halls, as developers could incorporate additional amenities within the casino footprint, such as restaurants, hotels, bars, and performing arts venues.

City officials argue that these sweeping changes are essential to streamline the regulatory process for the winners of the highly sought-after casino licenses. The move is seen as an effort to position New York City as a more attractive option compared to neighboring areas, where casinos are currently not allowed under existing zoning codes.

Dan Garodnick, the head of the Department of City Planning and the City Planning Commission, stressed the importance of establishing a level playing field for casino applicants within the city, reported AM New York. He stated that it was crucial to create such an environment as the state considers proposals for casinos downstate, allowing applicants within New York City to compete for this opportunity.

Concerns Rise Over Ambiguous Casino Zoning

While several bids for casinos have emerged, targeting prime locations such as Times Square, Hudson Yards, and Coney Island, some industry insiders believe existing “racinos” at Aqueduct Racetrack and Empire City Casino have an advantage due to their current footprint in racetracks with video slot machines.

The proposed zoning changes are expected to face a rigorous approval process, involving local community boards, Borough Presidents, Borough Boards, the City Planning Commission, City Council, and the Mayor. If approved, the amendment would expedite the process for chosen casino projects, bypassing the traditionally lengthy and complex land-use review.

However, the lack of specificity in the proposal has raised concerns among civic leaders. Layla Law-Gisiko, the land use chair at Manhattan Community Board 5, expressed bewilderment over the vague nature of the proposal, especially considering the meticulous details required for other zoning amendments.

Critics point out apparent contradictions within the proposal, such as the exemption of casino developers from the special permit requirement for new hotel developments, a requirement implemented in 2021 to mitigate adverse effects on local communities. The proposal’s ambiguity has sparked calls for a more detailed and strengthened review process to ensure the responsible development of potential casino complexes in the city.

The post Adams Administration’s Casino Zoning Plan Sparks Citywide Debate appeared first on Keno Wizard.

Richmond voters dealt a blow to the proposed $562 million Richmond Grand Resort and Casino, rejecting the project for the second time in three years. In 2021, Richmond voters were presented with the decision to support or reject a casino project, with 51% opposing and 49% favoring it. 

Child Care Advocates Express Disappointment as Richmond Rejects Casino Funding

One of the significant promises tied to the casino project was the allocation of funds for childcare programs, with an initial upfront payment of $26.5 million and an annual commitment of $19 million in casino revenue earmarked for the city. The rejection of the casino plan has now raised questions about the future of childcare funding in Richmond.

Child care advocates, including Ann Payes, CEO of the early childhood school readiness group Thrive Birth to Five, expressed disappointment over the failed casino project, reported The Richmond Times Dispatch. Payes highlighted that the annual $19 million could have significantly supported early childhood education programs, addressing issues such as lengthy wait times for child care and reducing financial burdens on families.

Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney, who invested considerable political capital in supporting the casino effort, emphasized the potential benefits during a September news conference. Stoney proposed using the casino revenue to build childcare and education centers, fund parks and recreation projects, and establish a trust fund to expand childcare access to low- to middle-class families.

Mayor Stoney Grapples with Childcare Funding Void After Casino Rejection

With the rejection of the casino, Stoney acknowledged that the plans for addressing the childcare shortage were no longer viable. The proposed $26.5 million upfront for child care centers and the annual commitment of $19 million to the Richmond Child Care and Education Trust Fund are now off the table.

Stoney’s office indicated that without the casino funding, alternative measures would need to be explored to address the childcare crisis. However, there are currently no plans to seek a tax increase for childcare funding, according to Stoney’s spokesman Gianni Snidle.

The rejection of the casino has left childcare advocates and officials exploring other avenues for funding. Organizations like Thrive Birth to Five are turning to state and federal governments for increased funding. Payes emphasized a commitment to making early childhood care happen, even if at a slower pace. The Richmond Public School system is also applying for Head Start and Early Head Start grants to increase the number of available childcare slots.

The post Richmond Casino Rejection Sparks Concerns Over Child Care Funding appeared first on Keno Wizard.

US President Joe Biden has reaffirmed his commitment to combating the proliferation of hidden fees, colloquially known as “junk fees,” that often catch consumers off guard when making reservations or purchasing tickets. 

President Biden’s Crusade Against Deceptive Pricing Tactics Gains Momentum

In recent posts on X (Formerly Twitter), President Joe Biden voiced his concerns over these deceptive pricing tactics. He argued that such fees frequently make a stay or event significantly more expensive than initially advertised, leaving consumers feeling misled and frustrated. Amid ongoing concerns about rising inflation affecting everyday expenses, Biden is determined to tackle the issue of misleading online pricing schemes.

The President emphasized the importance of transparency, stating: “Concert tickets are hard enough to get; you shouldn’t have to pay surprise service fees on top of that. My Administration is working to crack down on those junk fees so you know what you are paying for upfront.”

This initiative to address hidden fees in the hospitality and entertainment industries was first introduced by President Biden in October 2022. At that time, he announced his intention to instruct the Federal Trade Commission to develop regulations aimed at curbing unfair and deceptive fees across various sectors.

Despite these efforts, progress on the issue has been slow at the federal level. In July, Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-Minnesota) and Jerry Moran (R-Kansas) introduced bipartisan legislation known as the Hotel Fees Transparency Act. The bill aimed to compel hotels and resorts to include resort fees and any additional charges, excluding taxes, in their advertised rates. However, the bill has stalled in the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Gaming Industry and Politicians Clash Over Resort Fee Regulations

The gaming industry, represented by the American Gaming Association (AGA), opposes the mandatory inclusion of resort fees in advertised nightly rates, arguing that it would stifle their ability to compete and innovate. Senator Jacky Rosen, a Democrat from Nevada, who also serves on the committee, believes that many casinos and resorts in her state are already transparent in their booking policies.

Nevada’s Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D) and Representative Dina Titus (D) support the idea of transparent pricing but suggest that legislation should focus more on ticket charges rather than regulating casinos and hotels. They emphasized the need to ensure that the administration’s proposals prioritize the elimination of surprise fees rather than punishing establishments that already disclose their fees upfront.

While President Biden’s commitment to addressing junk fees has garnered attention, some critics have questioned whether this issue should be a top priority, given more pressing economic concerns facing the US. Critics argue that with the cost of groceries and other essential items on the rise, the focus on concert ticket fees may appear misplaced.

The post US President Biden’s Battle Against ‘Junk Fees’ Sparks National Debate appeared first on Keno Wizard.

Amid the fervent competition to secure licenses for New York City’s inaugural casinos, developers are undertaking unconventional strategies to garner local support, but this turns out to be a move sparking parental discontent.

This summer, a basketball camp held at Coney Island’s Kaiser Park was emblazoned with the logo of “The Coney”, a proposed casino project seeking to establish roots in the neighborhood, reported the New York Times. The basketball clinic, organized by Brooklyn USA Basketball, is just one example of the lengths to which casino operators are going to curry favor with local communities as they vie for coveted licenses.

While some parents decry the casinos for using their kids to advance a potentially detrimental agenda, others welcome the funding that enables enhanced sports programs and activities. The divisive issue has fueled heated debates on social media, bringing the ethics of casino-funded youth programs into the spotlight. The discussions have prompted deeper contemplation on the roles of gaming corporations within communities and the responsibilities they carry when engaging with the youth.

The controversy underlines the high stakes in the race for the three casino licenses in the New York City area. However, these battles extend beyond the boardrooms and into local communities, where concerns over the impact on children and ethics are in focus.

Silverstein and Greenwood Join the Race for New York’s Casino Licenses

Legal experts have noted that this grey area in advertising to minors continues to challenge states, despite measures in place to prevent casino operators from targeting young audiences. New York’s gaming regulators, for instance, have a pending rule proposal that would forbid marketing sports betting to minors, encompassing logos on clothing aimed at those under 21.

Besides The Coney, there are also other projects fighting for the coveted New York licenses. At the end of June, Silverstein Properties and Greenwood Gaming and Entertainment joined forces to vie for a commercial casino license in downstate New York. Their proposed “Avenir” casino hotel, situated in Manhattan’s far West Side, aims to tap into the area’s high demand for entertainment and gaming options. The collaboration faces tough competition from other casino operators, with factors like financial stability and project design influencing the regulatory evaluation process. The developers must also address community concerns, as seen in Coney Island where residents are protesting a Boardwalk casino bid due to crime and pollution fears.

The post Gambling Firms Backing Children’s Sports Sparks Controversy Among Parents appeared first on Keno Wizard.